0
Pvunderink Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

In spite of

Can someone please check if my sentence makes any sense?
Is it 'in spite of' or 'despite of'?

Information:
My regression result shows that the variable 'rail lines' is negatively correlated with economic output. I'm 100% sure that this is because during my period of investigation the number of rail lines dropped, and economic output increased.

The sentence I'm unsure about:
Hence, this relationship appears to be the result of economic growth in spite of a decrease in the number of rail lines.

Previous sentences:
In contrast, the variable ‘Rail lines’ reports a negative and significant impact on economic output. However, correlation does not imply causation. To put it another way, a correlation between two variables does not necessarily imply that one causes the other (Aldrich, 1995). All things considered, it seem totally illogical to claim that eliminating a way of transportation would maximize economic performance.
  

Top answer

Yes, I think your sentence makes sense. "despite of" is ungrammatical. "in spite of" and "despite" mean the same thing and are interchangeable.

  • Yes, I think your sentence makes sense.
  • "despite of" is ungrammatical.
  • "in spite of" and "despite" mean the same thing and are interchangeable.
  • I would change "way of transportation" to "method of transportation" (more usual collocation).
  • Typo: "it seem s ".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Yes, I think your sentence makes sense.

"despite of" is ungrammatical. "in spite of" and "despite" mean the same thing and are interchangeable.

I would change "way of transportation" to "method of transportation" (more usual collocation).

Typo: "it seems".

"To put it another way ..." actually seems to me to be putting it exactly the same way.

Bei
0
Thank you!
I changed the typo immediately Emotion: smile
Alright, method of transportation sounds good.
Maximization, according to th
0
PvunderinkMaximization, according to the regression result, would imply a total elimination of rail lines.
You may be right; I guess it depends on whether you read "maximize" as having global scope or scope only across this parameter. I read it as the former.

Related Questions