edu/opinion/re-marriage-epstein-30539 ) and why it is necessary to quote it right here Evidently they wish to indicate a/the legal precedent for that provision.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
diAAnaPWhat I don't understand is why it quoted a previously settled case (http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/re-marriage-epstein-30539 ) and why it is necessary to quote it right hereEvidently they wish to indicate a/the legal precedent for that provisi
Mister Micawber diAAnaPWhat I don't understand is why it quoted a previously settled case (http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/re-marriage-epstein-30539 ) and why it is necessary to quote it right here Evidently they wish to indicate a/the legal precedent for that prov
diAAnaPThen why isn't there an "e.g."/"for instance" before the sentence?It's not an example.
diAAnaPAlso why is it necessary?That is a legal decision, not a language decision.
Mister Micawber diAAnaPThen why isn't there an "e.g."/"for instance" before the sentence?It's not an example.diAAnaPAlso why is it necessary?That is a legal decision, not a language decision.You just said that it was used as a legal PRECEDENT for the case, Micawber ;D