0 Please read the following with patient.05002br 02br 01b00Longman02b00 02br 02br 00free00 00adverb00 00 00 00 00 00 02br 02br 00100 00without payment:02br 02br 00▸for free00 02br 02br 00• He offered to do the work 00for free00.02br 02br 00•All these services are available to the public 01u00free of charge02u00.02br 02br 02br 01b00Oxford02b00 02br 02br 00free00 adjective02br 02br 005costing nothing:02br 02br 00• Admission is free. 02br 02br 00• You can’t expect people to work 00for free00.00 (= without payment)02br 02br 02br 00adverb 02br 02br 001(also 00free of charge00) without payment02br 02br 00• Children under five travel 01u00free (of charge)02u00.02br 02br 00Thanks for reading.02br 02br 00Now, in Longman, both'for free' and 'free of charge' is classified as adverb.02br 02br 00But, in Oxford, 'for free' is classified as adjective, and 'free of charge' adverb.02br 02br 00Can you explain why this difference of view has happened?02br 02br 00[ Let me tell you what I thought.02br 02br 00Longman is right. Becase 'for free' is shortened form of 'for being free.'02br 02br 00What do you think of my view?]02br 02br 00Thanks. Bae.0510name[문서의 처음]
Top answer
0You can’t expect people to work for free. To work how (adverbial)? for free02br 02br 00for free 00≠for being free0-
— Inchoateknowledge
0You can’t expect people to work for free.
To work how (adverbial)?
for free02br 02br 00for free 00≠for being free0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0Gee, I don't exactly agree with your point.02br 02br 00In Oxford, 'free' is classified as adj. and it put 'for free' in this category.02br 02br 00It says '01u00free02u00' is 01u00adj02u00. and it put 'free' after '01u00for02u00', a definit 01u00preposition02u00.
0 ----------02br 01b00free02b02br 02br 00 Function: 01i00adverb02br 02i02br 01b00202b00 01b00:02b00 without charge <children admitted 01i00free02i00> <people have traditionally been able to walk into museums 01i00free02
0>But, in Oxford, 'for free' is classified as adjective, and 'free of charge' adverb.02br 02br 00 No, you're not correct. They define, as I see from your posting above, "free" as adjective or adverb, and show examples under those entries, using "for free". 02br 02br 00 But this doesn't mean that "for free" itself is an adjective. The sum of the wor
0Hi,02br 02br 00I'd like to add a comment.02br 02br 00'For free' is a phrase that is slowly moving from being substandard to being standard. It hasn't quite arrived at 'standard' yet, but you will hear it said very often. Educated people trying to speak carefuly will usually tend to avoid using it.02br 02br 00Best wishes, Clive0-
0Thanks all of you.02br 02br 00"For free" is adverb. 02br 02br 00Thanks again. 02br 02br 00(P.S. 02br 02br 00Oxford dictionary's exact name is 01u00'Oxford advanced learners' dictionary02u00.'02br 02br 00This book is really great, though.)0-