0
Hhtt Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

In order v. in order that v. in order for v. in order to

I would like to ask about the differences between "in order to", "in order for", "in order that" and just "in order."

Here is an example: "In order that such lines be parallel, they must have the same slope but different y-intercepts."

What if we use say "In order such lines be parallel ... " or "In order for such lines be parallel ..." or "in order to such lines be parallel ..." ?

Thank you.

  

Top answer

None of those are natural English. For two lines to be parallel, they must...

  • None of those are natural English.
  • For two lines to be parallel, they must...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0

None of those are natural English.

For two lines to be parallel, they must...
0

"In order that such lines be parallel ..." is OK, but a somewhat awkward and unexpected by most people. Better form: "In order for such lines to be parallel ..." Not "In order for such lines be parallel ..." because the verb is actually "to be". Sometimes the "to" can be left out if it's implied clearly enough, but in common (and correct) English usage, in your sentence to "to" is us

0
hhtt"in order to", "in order for", "in order that"

'in order' is followed by either a finite construction [ in order that ] or a non-finite construction [ in order (for ...) to ...].
_______

The finite construction is used mostly in academic or formal contexts and is typically a mandative ("subjunctive") or modal construction.

Related Questions