When using "just in case" does the first clause have to be in the same tense as the second?
I ran just in case the train was pulling in. I'm running just in case the train pulls in. I ran just in case the train pulled in. I was running just in case the train was pulling in.
Thank you
Top answer
e. -ing. Actually, you can use just about any combination EXCEPT you CAN'T use "in case + will" (as far as I know).
— AFE
e.
-ing.
Actually, you can use just about any combination EXCEPT you CAN'T use "in case + will" (as far as I know).
English conditional sentences are very "free", and you can do almost anything with them.
Also, most frequently "just in case" occurs at the end of a sentence (when spoken by native speakers).
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The "aspect" doesn't have to be the same i.e. -ing. Actually, you can use just about any combination EXCEPT you CAN'T use "in case + will" (as far as I know).
English conditional sentences are very "free", and you can do almost anything with them. Also, most frequently "just in case" occurs at the end of a sentence (when spoken by native speakers). For example:
Yes, you want the tenses to match. But I would use the progressive tense because I think you are talking about an action that is continuing (the train is pulling in rather than the train has pulled in and is now at a stop).
I ran just in case the train was pulling in.
I'm running just in case the train pulls in. I'm running just in case the train is pulling in
If you are studying "in case", then I presume you are at advanced level. In which case, you should be told that the tenses do not need to match. Some examples:
I ran to the station in case the train pulls in early.
I'm running really fast to the station in case the train pulled in early for once. You never know!