0
Catttt Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space

Does "a duality that is impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space" mean "a duality that is impossible to exist and imagine in the three-dimensional space we live in"?


Text:
My purpose here is rather to note how their experiments with form destabilise space in such a way that it empties itself, turning the inside out or outside in, creating a duality that is impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space but that echoes the entropic motion of the death drive, which, in seeking disintegration, inevitably spews out new forms.

  

Top answer

catttt Does "a duality that is impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space" mean "a duality that is impossible to exist and imagine in the three-dimensional space we live in"? The grammar of it is that we would inhabit the duality, that we would live in the duality. I do not know what that means.

  • catttt Does "a duality that is impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space" mean "a duality that is impossible to exist and imagine in the three-dimensional space we live in"?
  • The grammar of it is that we would inhabit the duality, that we would live in the duality.
  • I do not know what that means.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
cattttDoes "a duality that is impossible to inhabit in three-dimensional space" mean "a duality that is impossible to exist and imagine in the three-dimensional space we live in"?

The grammar of it is that we would inhabit the duality, that we would live in the duality. I do not know what that means.

Related Questions