0
Fence Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

implied preposition?

I'm trying to find out if the second sentence is grammatically correct:

"He opened the window and let the bird fly out. It was like a child whom he was now granting freedom."

A friend insists that it should be "It was like a child to whom he was now granting freedom." I think the preposition is implied and isn't required.

Thank you!
  

Top answer

I have to agree with your friend. My reasoning is based on the fact that we can't normally omit the 'preposition to' in sentences/phrases such as 'To whom did you speak' , 'To whom it may concern' etc. That said, we can usually use 'who' instead of 'whom' , provided that 'who' isn't immediately preceded by a preposition.

  • I have to agree with your friend.
  • My reasoning is based on the fact that we can't normally omit the 'preposition to' in sentences/phrases such as 'To whom did you speak' , 'To whom it may concern' etc.
  • That said, we can usually use 'who' instead of 'whom' , provided that 'who' isn't immediately preceded by a preposition.
  • Who did you speak to ?
  • ')
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
I have to agree with your friend. My reasoning is based on the fact that we can't normally omit the 'preposition to' in sentences/phrases such as 'To whom did you speak' , 'To whom it may concern' etc.

That said, we can usually use 'who' instead of 'whom' , provided that 'who' isn't immediately preceded by a preposition.

Who did you speak to? (less formal than
0
fenceI think the preposition is implied and isn't required.
I do too, but a lot of people disagree with me. I think you and I (at least) are on the losing end of this argument — so far, anyway.

Related Questions