0
Zuotengdazuo Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

I'm not sure about the meaning the "strain" in these sentences?

I have looked up this word in several dictionaries to know that it can mean "exceed the scope of". But I still don't understand the word when it appears in some specific contexts.
Like in the following sentence

1. In the era of the Internet, the efficacy of the name suppression orders (I don't understand what "name suppression orders" means either) was always going to be severely strained, but some online publishers took the issue seriously.
2. When among is automatically chosen for more than two, English idiom may be strained.
For the first sentence, my understanding is that the "orders" is alway going to be disobeyed.

As to the second one, I think it means "English idiom may be mangled or sound unnatual/strange".

Is my understanding right? Please let me know. If I am wrong, please tell me how to interpret them correctly.
Thank you teachers.
  

Top answer

zuotengdazuo For the first sentence, my understanding is that the "orders" is alway were always going to be disobeyed. That could be. However, it's the efficacy that was going to be strained, so it was going to be nearly impossible to obey the orders, even when everybody wanted to obey the orders — and not that anyone deliberately disobeyed the orders.

  • zuotengdazuo For the first sentence, my understanding is that the "orders" is alway were always going to be disobeyed.
  • That could be.
  • However, it's the efficacy that was going to be strained, so it was going to be nearly impossible to obey the orders, even when everybody wanted to obey the orders — and not that anyone deliberately disobeyed the orders.
  • zuotengdazuo As to the second one, I think it means "English idiom may be mangled or sound unnatual/strange".
  • Yes.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
zuotengdazuoFor the first sentence, my understanding is that the "orders" is alway were always going to be disobeyed.
That could be. However, it's the efficacy that was going to be strained, so it was going to be nearly impossible to obey the orders, even when everybody wanted to obey the orders — and not that an
0
Thank you very much. But I still don't understand what the author means by "efficacy was going to be strained" ,because it is someone else who told me I should interpret the sentence as such. I myself don't quite understand the meaning of "strain" in it. So can you bother to explain it further?
0
zuotengdazuostrain
When you strain something (in this usage), you push it to its limits. It's like pulling on a rubber band. You pull it harder and harder. Or, you can say that you put more and more strain on it. If you pull too hard (if you put too much strain on it), it will break; it will snap into two pieces. "strain" is what the rubber band 'e
0
Thank you so much. So the idea is that the operation was going to make itself less and less effective as time passed, so people were not willing to obey it, right?
0
zuotengdazuoSo the idea is that the operation was going to make itself less and less effective as time passed
Yes.
zuotengdazuoso people were not willing to obey it
Possibly, or they found it impossible to perform their tasks effectively even if they were willing to.

CJ

Related Questions