0
Anonymous Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

I'm glad to see you so enthusiastic.

(in a movie)
Robot: I can't promise I'll allow the actual burglary, but I'm glad to see you so enthusiastic.

Is the structure of the phrase, see you so enthusiastic correct? And then how can I understand it? I have never seem the structure of see object adjective, so is this new?

Thank you.
  

Top answer

It was hard to find a dictionary on line that treated this meaning of "see". Collins has it: "to perceive with any or all of the senses? I hate to see you so unhappy".

  • It was hard to find a dictionary on line that treated this meaning of "see".
  • Collins has it: "to perceive with any or all of the senses?
  • I hate to see you so unhappy".
  • It is plain English of long standing.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
It was hard to find a dictionary on line that treated this meaning of "see". Collins has it: "to perceive with any or all of the senses? I hate to see you so unhappy". It is plain English of long standing.
0
When you see seemingly unexplainable grammatical constructions like this, the explanation is often simply ellipsis - words have been left out, for the sake of brevity or convenience, and are understood from the context. Here the complete wording is: "I'm glad to see that you are so enthusiastic." The words "that" and "are" have been left out for brevity's sake, and are understood from the cont
0
Anonymous The words "that" and "are" have been left out for brevity's sake, and are understood from the context.
No, they aren't. The construction stands on its own. From Hamlet: I am glad to see you well. From The Winter's Tale: I never wish'd to see you sorry.

Related Questions