0A guy decides to order the same dish his girlfriend has just ordered and says, "I'll have what she's having."02br 02br 00Is it more correct to say "I'll have what she'll have" so the main clause matches the subclause's tense? Also, "she's having" carries a possibility that the girl is now eating the food which is not true, though the listener will likely to interpret it as a scheduled activity - her having the food is no doubt going to happen soon. Matching the tense makes sense grammatically and also in this context. After all, they are doing the exact same thing at the time - ordering.02br 02br 00Thanks in advance!0-
Top answer
02i 00--01b 00Not at all02b 00; to be doing is a form of the future:01i 00 I01b 00'll be having02b 00 tea tomorrow, too02i 00. 0-
— Mister Micawber
02i 00--01b 00Not at all02b 00; to be doing is a form of the future:01i 00 I01b 00'll be having02b 00 tea tomorrow, too02i 00.
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 .02br 02br 01i00Is it more correct to say "I'll have what she'll have" so the main clause matches the subclause's tense?02i00 -- 01b00No02b00; verb tenses need have no grammatical relation:01i00 I'01b00ll have02b00 the same tea now that I 01b00had 02b00yesterday.02i