(If you take) One more step, or you're a dead man.

Question

(If you take) One more step, or you're a dead man.Does the above sound right and make sense? Thanks.

Khoff · Accepted Answer

No. It's "one more step and you're a dead man." Being dead is presented as a consequence of taking one more step, not an alternative.

Clive · Answer

Hi,

(If you take) One more step, or you're a dead man.

Does the above sound right No and make sense No ?

Say it either of these two ways. #2 is the common way.

If you take one more step, you're a dead man.

One more step and you're a dead man.

Best wishes, Clive

Angliholic · Answer

Thanks, Khoff and Clive.

I agree that your version makes perfect sense. But if the condition is that you ask someone to take one more step forward, or you threaten you'll do something harmful to them. Then does the base sentence make sense?

Angliholic · Answer

On second thought, the base sentence is somewhat obscure. If it is the following, then does it make sense?

One more step, or you're are a dead man.

(I command you to take) One more step, or (if you don't follow my order) you're a dead man.

CalifJim · Answer

You've caught the ambiguity here.

If one more step is meant as a command to take one more step, then

One more step, and you're a dead man. = Take one more step, and when you do, then I will kill you. (Not idiomatic. Anomalous.)
One more step, or you're a dead man. = Take one more step, because if you do not take one more step, then I will kill you.
_______

On the other hand, if one more step is meant as a command not to take one more step, then

One more step, and you're a dead man. = Don't take one more step, because if you do take one more step, I will kill you. (This is the usual meaning that comes immediately to mind for the native speaker.)
One more step, or you're a dead man. = Don't take one more step, because if you don't, I will know that you are dead. (Or some such totally anomalous interpretation. Not idiomatic at all.)
_______

The upshot of the observations above is that if you have a phrase that is an affirmative imperative (explicit or implicit), the following statement of the consequence (of "disobedience") is connected by or. If the phrase indicates a negative imperative, the consequent phrase is connected by and.
_______

Get 100% on the final exam, or fail the course. (If you don't get 100%, you will fail the course.)
Get at least 75% on the final, and pass the course. (If you get at least 75% on the final, you will pass the course.)
_______

It should now be clear how the two statements below differ, i.e., which shows a desire for Jenny to come to the party and which shows a desire for Jenny not to come to the party. (Assume that my resignation is undesirable to whoever I'm speaking to.)

Jenny comes to the party, or I'm resigning from the club.
Jenny comes to the party, and I'm resigning from the club.
________

And it should now be clear which of the two is required here.

Neglect you health, ___ [and? / or?] you'll get sick.

CJ

Angliholic · Answer

Thanks, Jim, for the expressive and elaborate reply.

Clive · Answer

Hi,

Then say it this way.

If you don't take one more step, you're a dead man.

One more step or you're a dead man.

Clive

Angliholic · Answer

CliveHi,

Then say it this way.

If you don't take one more step, you're a dead man.

One more step or you're a dead man.

Clive

Thanks, Clive.

To make sure, it does make sense to you to say "One more step, or you're a dead man?"

Clive · Answer

Hi,

It makes sense, but it seems like a less common thing to say.

It would be more common to tell people 'Stop' rather than 'Take one more step'.

Clive

Angliholic · Answer

CliveHi,

It makes sense, but it seems like a less common thing to say.

It would be more common to tell people 'Stop' rather than 'Take one more step'.

Clive

Thanks, Clive.

Interestingly though, both versions in question make perfect in my language.

(If you take) One more step, or you're a dead man.

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions