Anonymous probably after I agree. Anonymous note: in remote conditionals, the simple past is often used instead of the past perfect for past time reference (If something went wrong, I could’ve... instead of If something had gone wrong.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymousprobably afterI agree.
Anonymousnote: in remote conditionals, the simple past is often used instead of the past perfect for past time reference (If something went wrong, I could’ve... instead of If something had gone wrong. grammar books don’t tell you that though)Actually, I'm already aware of this. But thanks.
fivejedjonListenever, I accidentally deleted , the post you are quoting. My apologies to all concerned.Not a problem, cause I've quoted all the important parts.
listeneverThis is what troubles me. I know of "historical present" itself, but I've never come across the historical present being used in the main clause of a remote conditional. Moreover, considering the fact that the very reason that you use a remote conditional is so you can sort of distance yourself from what you think is an unreal action by using the past tense (suc
listeneverIf you're interested in this thread, could you instead answer my question regarding the historical present being used in a remote conditional?I would say that it was totally unacceptable in writing. However, whether we like it or not, some speakers do switch to the present in informal conversation. I don't recommend you try it.