Hello, Gurus and Members!
If God did not exist, everything would be permitted.
........... Here, we can see that “If + past + would” refers to the Present or Future events.
But there seem to be sentences in the same structure that must be interpreted to mean Past events. :
Yet if I heard it was in stock I would drop what I was doing to buy more.
Then, can we say that “If + past + would” can refer to the events of Past, Present and Futre?
Is it that the context decides?
pructus there seem to be sentences in the same structure that must be interpreted to mean Past events. : Yet if I heard it was in stock I would drop what I was doing to buy more. That is also present and future: it is Conditional II.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
pructusthere seem to be sentences in the same structure that must be interpreted to mean Past events. :Yet if I heard it was in stock I would drop what I was doing to buy more.
That is also present and future: it is Conditional II.
pructusIs it that the context decides?
Yes. Some sentences can be read two (or more) ways. These sentences, which I've made very similar to yours, illustrate the point, particularly 2 and 3:
1. I don't usually hunt for bargains. Yet if I hear that a certain item is on sale, I'll drop what I'm doing to buy it. (habit in the present)