0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

If it were

Salaam!

I am confused about how to write conditional statement in simple past. They are either past perfect or present. If he were rich, he would do it - present. If he had been rich, he would have done it. - past perfect.

Is there some way to write conditionals in simple past?

Kind regards
  

Top answer

-- This is past conditional (Conditional III). he would') utilizes past verb forms.

  • -- This is past conditional (Conditional III).
  • he would') utilizes past verb forms.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
If he had been rich, he would have done it.-- This is past conditional (Conditional III). It utilizes a past perfect verb form, just as present conditional II ('If he were...he would') utilizes past verb forms.
0
Salaam, M. I am a little confused, so I'll give another example in which I use conditional utilizing past perfect: If he had altered his plan, we would have succeeded.
But I don't want past perfect! I want the conditional in simple past, so would this do: If he altered his plan, we would succeed.

Also present conditional, even though utilizing past form, is considered present tense
0
Once again:

If he had altered his plan, we would have succeeded.-- This is simple past conditional III (condition contrary to past fact)

If he altered his plan, we would succeed.-- This is simple present conditional II (conditional inimical to present possibility).
If he alters his plan, we will succeed-- This is simple present conditional I (conditio
0
Mister MicawberIf he alters his plan, we will succeed-- This is simple present conditional I (conditional of reasonable present possibility).
Salaam again, M. This is what I am getting at. Is it possible to show reasonable possibility in past tense instead of present?
0
I don't see how, since the event would either have transpired or not transpired in the past; the issue of probability is not germane.
0
Mister MicawberI don't see how, since the event would either have transpired or not transpired in the past; the issue of probability is not germane.
What I mean is future in past, something like this: If he altered his plan, we were going to succeed. Here the future is expressed in terms of simple past without any conditional.
0
Well, that sentence is fine. Why don't you use it?

Related Questions