0
Guest Posted 22 years ago
Grammar
If it wasn't, if it weren't...
This one is driving me nuts.
I have studied the rules of the past subjunctive, so I (Think I) know about counterfactual conditions and the proper use of was/were.
I also know that many native english speakers ignore the rules of the subjunctive altogether. Yet I am puzzled because sometimes, the same author, even in the same passage applies both forms. That leads me to believe that they are perceived differently.
Some examples:
If it wasn't for me, you'd be in trouble now
If it weren't for me, you'd be in trouble now
I think the second one is correct, eventhough many native speakers might use the first one.
---
Now, look at the following ones. All taken from the same passage.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/muslims_good.htm
Please do not comment on the context. I found it on google searching for the phrases. This is not propaganda in any way, so please stick to the grammar.
If it weren't for Muslims, horses would have never been brought to the European world
Things like curry, garlic, onions, peppercorn, and other spices would not be enjoyed if it wasn't for the impact of the Muslim world
If it weren't for the Muslims then many nations would not have been formed, many foods would not be enjoyed, many types of transportation would not be used, and many ideas would not have been shared
Besides these examples, I have also noticed that "if it wasn't" is more common in counterfactual past phrases rather than in counterfactual present.
For example
if it wasn't for that setback, our job would have been much easier than it was
I dont know if "If it weren't" would be correct here. I would say "If it hadn't been", or, even better, "had it not been", but definately not "if it wasn't". Yet the latter seems to be by far the most common form.
So please enlighten me, if you can. Which is the correct form and why? Assuming I want to apply the subjunctive rules consistently.
I have studied the rules of the past subjunctive, so I (Think I) know about counterfactual conditions and the proper use of was/were.
I also know that many native english speakers ignore the rules of the subjunctive altogether. Yet I am puzzled because sometimes, the same author, even in the same passage applies both forms. That leads me to believe that they are perceived differently.
Some examples:
If it wasn't for me, you'd be in trouble now
If it weren't for me, you'd be in trouble now
I think the second one is correct, eventhough many native speakers might use the first one.
---
Now, look at the following ones. All taken from the same passage.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/muslims_good.htm
Please do not comment on the context. I found it on google searching for the phrases. This is not propaganda in any way, so please stick to the grammar.
If it weren't for Muslims, horses would have never been brought to the European world
Things like curry, garlic, onions, peppercorn, and other spices would not be enjoyed if it wasn't for the impact of the Muslim world
If it weren't for the Muslims then many nations would not have been formed, many foods would not be enjoyed, many types of transportation would not be used, and many ideas would not have been shared
Besides these examples, I have also noticed that "if it wasn't" is more common in counterfactual past phrases rather than in counterfactual present.
For example
if it wasn't for that setback, our job would have been much easier than it was
I dont know if "If it weren't" would be correct here. I would say "If it hadn't been", or, even better, "had it not been", but definately not "if it wasn't". Yet the latter seems to be by far the most common form.
So please enlighten me, if you can. Which is the correct form and why? Assuming I want to apply the subjunctive rules consistently.
Top answer
Hay guy that too long for a question!! I think it is something to do with plural and singular
- Hay guy that too long for a question!!
- I think it is something to do with plural and singular
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
14 Answers
0
Hay guy that too long for a question!!
I think it is something to do with plural and singular
I think it is something to do with plural and singular
00
Does that mean nobody knows? ****. If even the regulars of an english language forum are bored to read my question guess there's nobody that can help me!
It was long because I wanted to make it as clear as possible
It was long because I wanted to make it as clear as possible
00
I am not an expert on the subject and the English language in general, but I think that “were” should be used when the statement is contrary to the fact (if I put it right).
If they say: “ If it wasn’t for Muslims... “, They mean that Muslims are actually responsible for the events described.
Looks like I could use some explanation on the subject too.
If they say: “ If it wasn’t for Muslims... “, They mean that Muslims are actually responsible for the events described.
Looks like I could use some explanation on the subject too.
00
Hi!
Visit this site. It mentions about this thing. (link outdated)
It would appear that 'wasn't is used informally, and for formal writing, if...weren't or if...were is to be used.
Hope this clears up your doubts.
WJTW
Visit this site. It mentions about this thing. (link outdated)
It would appear that 'wasn't is used informally, and for formal writing, if...weren't or if...were is to be used.
Hope this clears up your doubts.
WJTW
00
I think you are correct on all counts.
The subjunctive is the "correct" form in the examples you have given, but as you have noted, it is widely disregarded in modern English, even to the point of being almost obsolete.
Personally, I like the subjunctive, particularly in creative writing, because it creates an almost wistful mood, a sense of longing...
In a commercia
The subjunctive is the "correct" form in the examples you have given, but as you have noted, it is widely disregarded in modern English, even to the point of being almost obsolete.
Personally, I like the subjunctive, particularly in creative writing, because it creates an almost wistful mood, a sense of longing...
In a commercia
00
The subjunctive is merely the name for some structures that were used much more in older forms of English. There is nothing magical about them. Most have long since been replaced by other forms which say the same thing. A few remain, "If S were" is one of them.
"Was" has been used for centuries as a replacement for 'were' and in many situations the meanings are identical, context lets u
"Was" has been used for centuries as a replacement for 'were' and in many situations the meanings are identical, context lets u
00
they was playin' a game
BEV- i think its used incorrectly in this statement
BEV- i think its used incorrectly in this statement
00
It IS used incorrectly in this statement, and it doesn't even have anything to do with the subjunctive here...
It should be, "they were playing a game", because the pronoun is plural.
It should be, "they were playing a game", because the pronoun is plural.
00
If it weren't for is correct. If it wasn't for is incorrect. Not all the native speakers know the grammar. I remember back in school we had "you was" club and all the students who thought it was correct to say for example, "you was right" were the members of that club and wore "you was" tags on their cloths during English classes. However, when they applied themselves seriously later on and finall
00
AnonymousIf it weren't for is correct. If it wasn't for is incorrect. Not all the native speakers know the grammar. I remember back in school we had "you was" club and all the students who thought it was correct to say for example, "you was right" were the members of that club and wore "you was" tags on their clothes durin
0
Related Questions