0
Snappy Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

If I were/had been a bird

Which is natural?

If I were a bird, I could have flown to you at that time.
If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time.
  

Top answer

Both of these are natural: If I were a bird, I could fly to you . (present time) If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time. (past time)

  • Both of these are natural: If I were a bird, I could fly to you .
  • (present time) If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time.
  • (past time)
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
Both of these are natural:

If I were a bird, I could fly to you. (present time)
If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time. (past time)
0
What I wanted to clarify is if it is possible to say, "If I were a bird, I could have flown to you."

Please look at the following sentences.

Last week, I saw a newspaper ad offering a limited sale on 50 new computers at a discount price.
I would have bought it if I were rich/if I had been rich.

I am not rich. I was not rich, either. As a matter of fact I've never b
0
Snappy:

Yes, it is possible. I am not a grammar expert, but advising only from how I think about the subjunctive tenses as a native speaker.

If I were rich, I would (could) buy the computer.-> this is OK. It relates to present time.

If I were rich, I would (could) have bought the computer. -> This is OK and says that I am not rich now, and that the opportunity fo
0
AlpheccaStarsIf I had been rich, I would (could) have bought the computer. -> This is OK, too, but it implies that this point in time was not recent, but some time ago. I might be rich now. Especially if I use the adverb "then", it implies that I am rich now, but was not at the time. (If I had been rich then, I would have...).
Then "If I were a bird, I
0
SnappyThen "If I were a bird, I could have flown to you at that time" should be okay, because I was not a bird and I am not a bird. "If I had been a bird, I could have flow to you at that time" should be gramatically okay too.
Corrections: "If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time" should be gramatically okay too.
0
It has passed a few months, but I am still confused.
1. Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
a) If I had been a bird, I could have flown to you at that time. (This is grammatically correct.)
b) If I were a bird, I could have flown to you at that time. (Most native speakers do not think that this sentence sounds right, because the tenses are mixed.)
c) If I were rich
0
Let me explain both sentences with below timeline.

Timeline:
..(a)Before today.......(b)Today........(c)After today

1. If I were a bird (WRONG for a to b timeline).
2. If I had been a bird (CORRECT for a to b timeline).

Case 1: If you become something today then you will do something in timeline from b to c.
Case 2: I
0
Note that you are the first to reply to this thread since August of 2009. It is doubtful whether the original poster is still around to appreciate your reply.

CJ
0
My reply was for people (having the same question) who find this page in top 5 results on google.

~vas
0
AnonymousMy reply was for people (having the same question) who find this page in top 5 results on google.~vas
OK. Just saying.

CJ

Related Questions