Ielts writing task 2

In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want.

To what extent should children have to follow rules?

It is true that in some nations, kids have to follow a strict code of conduct while in some countries they are not. The purpose of this essay is to discuss both sides of this contentious argument and then explain why I agree with the latter view.

On the one hand, proponents of the idea that children should not follow strict rules of behavior tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, it will make children free to invent. For example, children with a lot of freedom will feel curiosity about everything around them, which makes them broaden knowledge faster than those who only study at school. Another compelling reason is that they will become more self-reliant, more independent. For instance, parents teach their kids this way will leave them to play alone, not look after them with so much time, everything that their sons make, they not hold the responsibility for it but by themself.

on the other hand, I believe that children must follow a code of conduct. The primary reason is that, they will become a good mature of society. Thus, kids must be guided in the observation of parents and school, they will orientate children when they lost their way, encourage and help them to surpass. Furthermore, it will bring a lot of career opportunities for children. To illustrate, Japanese companies recruit employees, who have permissive characteristics and follow the rules of the company, it only gains when kids had been teaching from a young.

In conclusion, I believe that although leaving the children to do anything they want have some advantages but i prefer the idea that children should learn a rules of behavior when they were a young.