Question: Some people say that universities should be concerned with educating people so that they will have wide general knowledge and be able to consider important matters from an informed viewpoint. Other people say that universities should simply train students to do the jobs required by society and not concern themselves with broader issues. Discuss.
Answer:
The idea that universities should quip widespread grasp or practical skills for students remains a source of controversy. While some people think that learners can achieve benefits from being taught general theory, others hold different idea that training students with knowledge that is necessary for work is more important. The following paragraph will discuss the validity of both sides.
On the one hand, concentrating on educating people with extensively general knowledge is useful for learners as a whole. Students who gain comprehensive knowledge could apply their understanding in different work. Actually, jobs are various and usually changed. Therefore, with broad knowledge, commuters may handle and enhance their capacity to adapt with job requirements. Besides, not all people find suitable jobs as the original intention. Hence, from fundamental theories, they could develop themselves to match with new jobs. For example, in Vietnam, statistics have showed that approximately 50%-graduated students must work contrary to the initial specialized training.
On the other hand, contrasting opinions are raised in supporting for the idea that universities should train students with skills which jobs require. Advocates to this perspective believe that graduated students need to adapt quickly with work in companies. Thus, it is necessary to provide practical skills than theory. For example, a designer needs how to Photoshop an image while calculating a double integral is not important. Not to mentioned, not all work such as plumber or electrician request academic subjects. Therefore, training learners suitably with the requirements of jobs is more vital in some extents.
In conclusion, both sides hold reasonable claims. Thus, policy makers should consider all aspects to establish educational programs appropriately with the demands of society.
The idea that universities should quip widespread grasp or practical skills for teach students a wide range of subjects remains a source of controversy. While some people think that learners students can achieve derive benefits from being taught a broader curriculum, general theory, others hold different idea contend that training students with specialized knowledge that is necessary for work and i s, therefore, more important. The following paragraph essay will discuss the validity of both perspectives.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The idea that universities should quip widespread grasp or practical skills for teach students a wide range of subjects remains a source of controversy. While some people think that learners students can achieve