Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole.
What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development?
Many isolated natural places, such as the South Pole and the ocean, are researched and visiting by scientists and travellers. There are two benefits of this trend, education and economy, but the drawbacks are more significant.
On the one hand, there are some advantages of expanding travel and research to remote natural areas. First, it is necessary for education and science. For example, scientists may discover more about the history of the earth, and people may have more chances to stay close to race animals, such as penguins and dolphins, to learn about them. Furthermore, this is a chance to provide a boost to the national economy, such as Brazil and Greenland. This is because the tourism industry is experienced a dramatic increase in recent years, and many countries spend a great deal of money investing the natural tourism.
On the other hand, there are several disadvantages of allowing scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural places. First of all, the local creature, such as penguins and bears, have changed their behaviours. The reason is that many travellers feed wild animals, and then those animals forget how to hunt and depend on humans. Second, isolated natural environments have to face the depletion from people. For instance, the Amazon forest plays an important role to reduce greenhouse gases, but many trees are cut down to build travel facilities, such as harbours and roads. In early 2021, a research showed that the amount of carbon dioxide which is produced by the Amazon forest is higher than the production of oxygen.
In conclusion, the disadvantages of travelling and researching in remote natural areas are more significant. The government around the world should introduce more ways to balance between economy and environment which ensure a better life for the future generations.
yuuy83 Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. The South Pole must be the most boring, inhospitable and uninviting place on the surface of the earth to visit. It is many hundreds of miles from any place with anything of interest to a tourist - wildlife or native peoples.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
yuuy83Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole.
The South Pole must be the most boring, inhospitable and uninviting place on the surface of the earth to visit. It is many hundreds of miles from any place with anything of interest to a tourist - wildlife or native peoples. There is
Many isolated natural places, such as the Canadian Arctic, northern Norway the South Pole and the rainforests of Papua New Guinea or the Amazon, the ocean, are researched and visiting (wrong form) by scientists and travellers. There