0
Angliholic Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

I was angry at/with John for saying that.

I was angry at/with John for saying that.

Hi,
Do both at and with fit in the above and mean about the same to you? Thanks.
  

Top answer

Hi, Sometimes no difference. But here's a couple of small comments. 'angry with' - sounds a bit like I know the person.

  • Hi, Sometimes no difference.
  • But here's a couple of small comments.
  • 'angry with' - sounds a bit like I know the person.
  • 'angry at' - maybe I don't know him.
  • eg 'I am angry at George Bush' sounds better than 'I am angry with him', because I don't know the man.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Hi,

Sometimes no difference. But here's a couple of small comments.

'angry with' - sounds a bit like I know the person.

'angry at' - maybe I don't know him.

eg 'I am angry at George Bush' sounds better than 'I am angry with him', because I don't know the man.

Clive
0

Killer was 'angry at life, angry at ***'

0
Hi,
'At' sounds OK.
Clive

Related Questions