wow. In the first scenario: He was talking, and I wanted (needed) to hit him to make him quit talking, but he quit talking, so I didn't have the need to hit him. 2nd scenario: He was hungry and would have to go hungry longer, but I gave him some money, so he didn't have to continue being hungry.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Zackscofieldoconner"I would haveThere is no need for "had to". This is a 3rd conditional sentence, just like this one.had tohit him if he hadn't shut up!" and said " He would havehad togone hungry if I hadn't given him some money."