So it occurred to me just now that the sentence "I just got to work" could mean either: 1. I just arrived at work ("work" in this instance referring to one's place of employment) or 2. I just started working ("work" referring to the activity in this case).
I'm interested in how one would explain the ambiguity between the two understandings from a grammatical perspective. Is "to work" a prepositional phrase in one analysis (the one that understands "work" to mean the place) and maybe a catenative complement in the second (in which one understands "work" to mean the action of working) ?
Huge thanks in advance!
" (= I just arrived at my place of employment. This is the meaning that would almost always be intended with this sentence. " D: "I just got to work on it.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The context in which the given sentence appears would make the meaning clear, for example:
A: "Where are you now?"
B: "I just got to work." (= I just arrived at my place of employment. This is the meaning that would almost always be intended with this sentence. The meanings shown below are unusual.)
C: "What about the report I asked you to do?"
D: "I ju
I have a hunch that your guesses are correct, but I will let others more versed in grammar respond to your question.
There is also a third interpretation that you did not mention.
"I just got to work" could also be interpreted as "I must work."
Imagine a guy who has been unemployed with various bills piling up saying to his wife, "I just got to work to pay all these bills." I
anonymousIs "to work" a prepositional phrase in one analysis (the one that understands "work" to mean the place) and maybe a catenative complement in the second (in which one understands "work" to mean the action of working) ?
That's a pretty good explanation, but I can't see "work" as a verb in either interpretation.
a) work = the workplace
b) wo