0
Bepleased Posted 14 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing
I have nothing to do with her
Hi,
1. (my version) Connected with her, I have / bear / experience nothing which is necessary in order to complete something or bring it into a desired state.
2. [to have] in there can identify itself to us as [to bear / receive / obtain]?
Could any one tell me it is correct or not?
Thank you for your assistance.
1. (my version) Connected with her, I have / bear / experience nothing which is necessary in order to complete something or bring it into a desired state.
2. [to have] in there can identify itself to us as [to bear / receive / obtain]?
Could any one tell me it is correct or not?
Thank you for your assistance.
Top answer
Nope. Utterly meaningless to me.
- Nope.
- Utterly meaningless to me.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
7 Answers
0
0
Ok, I try to make it to have / represent / express meaning to you.
1. rephrased: Nothing has me must to do for something else in the thing connected with her.
2. = I experience nothing / or nothing is fastened on me
Wish to have your teaching to me.
1. rephrased: Nothing has me must to do for something else in the thing connected with her.
2. = I experience nothing / or nothing is fastened on me
Wish to have your teaching to me.
00
Well, consider these instead:
1. rephrased: Nothing connects me with her.
2. = I experience nothing/ Nothing exists for me
1. rephrased: Nothing connects me with her.
2. = I experience nothing/ Nothing exists for me
00
Hi,
Thanks a lot Mister Micawber.
Your patience keep me feel your feeling in English.
By the way, to say {Nothing exists for me} is to say [Nothing is intended for me./ Nothing has me as its purpose]
In showing purpose we can say [nothing is for me], in showing the result of purpose we can say [nothing is / goes with me or nothing attends on me] because at this
Thanks a lot Mister Micawber.
Your patience keep me feel your feeling in English.
By the way, to say {Nothing exists for me} is to say [Nothing is intended for me./ Nothing has me as its purpose]
In showing purpose we can say [nothing is for me], in showing the result of purpose we can say [nothing is / goes with me or nothing attends on me] because at this
00
By the way, to say {Nothing exists for me} is to say [Nothing is intended for me./ Nothing has me as its purpose] -- I cannot agree, since, in the first place, only sentient things have intentions and purpose.
I think that in general you are using vocabulary beyond you in an attempt to analyze simpler vocabulary. That is the backward way to approach language learning. Read about
I think that in general you are using vocabulary beyond you in an attempt to analyze simpler vocabulary. That is the backward way to approach language learning. Read about
00
Mister Micawber I cannot agree, since, in the first place, only sentient things have intentions and purpose.
Hi,
Thank you for your teacing.
Man may, sometimes, comes over an accepter of an action of things as .
If I were in the thing's shoe, I can show you the power of the thing. That is the reason for I do so.
Tell me please
00
You are babbling spiritualism, bepleased, not studying language. I am not interested in ***.
0
Related Questions