Q: And then can we never think that relative clauses modify store and convenience modifies store respectively?
A: I don't follow the logic. a convenience store which is nearby and a big store which is nearby have virtually the same analysis. The difference is that 'convenience' is a noun which modifies 'store', and 'big' is an adjective that modifies 'store'.
I am really sorry, but this issue is really bothering me nowadays. Please, help me out again
I got the answer long time ago from a good helper here and I thought that I understood it at that time.
I understand that The difference is that 'convenience' is a noun which modifies 'store', and 'big' is an adjective that modifies 'store'.
And then, does which is nearby modify convenience store or store or both are possible?
And does which is nearby modify big store or store or both are possible?
If both are possible, do both ways carry the same meaning?
I am really sorry for posting the same questions and not understanding well.
And I have failed to add comments on my last threads without knowing reasons. That's way I am asking this question again. I am sorry to bother and take your time.
Hans51 And then, does which is nearby modify convenience store or store or both are possible? English grammar is not carved in stone. It is purely descriptive, and there are many ways to describe it.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hans51And then, does which is nearby modify convenience store or store or both are possible?
English grammar is not carved in stone. It is purely descriptive, and there are many ways to describe it. Pick a grammar book or two and learn each one.
Hans51And does which is nearby modify big store or store or both are possible?