0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

I don't understand why this sentence is like....(PLZ!!!)

1i01font00"A failure in this regard will further weaken 01font00what little political authority he has02font00"02font02i02br
02br
00This is one from the editorial printed in an english newspaper here in korea.02br
02br
00But I think that 'what' in those purple letters is not proper. 02br
02br
00I think it should be like just02br
02br
00"A failure in this reagard will further weaken little political authority he has"02br
02br
00or02br
02br
00"A failure in this regard will further weaken little political authority that he has'02br
02br
00Am I right? or, is that sentence above correct? and it it's correct sentence, plz let me know why 'what' can be used in that phrase.0-
  

Top answer

02span 02i 02p 00 0-

  • 02span 02i 02p 00 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
*71*0 01table01tr01td01td02tr02table
05002td02td
01p

01i01span00"A failure in this regard will further weaken 01span00what little political authority he has

0
0It is correct as written, or it could be "... will further weaken 01b00the 02b00little polical authority..."02br
02br
00It will weaken something... what will it weaken? It weakens the authority he still has. You can substitute "what" for the "the" in this type of construction:02br
02br
00"She took what little money she had and donat
0
0thank you for your reply. I got it now. 050010id2
0
In this sentence, it's true that the politician's power/authority will be weakened, but it's not necessarily true that he's a "lame duck." There's no evidence from the initial sentence to indicate his status as a "lame duck."

A "lame duck" refers to a politician who is in his/her last term of office and can't run again for that office. For example, George W. Bush is serving his second

Related Questions