. Yes, that massive elision is unacceptable, leaving the remaining grammar incorrect. Your original, I always get confused by Larry’s phone number with Tony's, should read I always confuse Larry’s phone number with Tony's. .
With due respect, I beg to differ. If one is confused, or get confused, something is confusing him or caused him to be confused. What you have in your “correct” sentence is an active voice sentence. Unless all I learned was wrong,, the above is always expressed in passive structure. I am not the only one with this knowledge. I only cut and pasted 4 out of many thousands from the
. I find none of your sources authoritative; all are lay persons writing casually and carelessly. However, this discussion may have been set off by my ill-considered first post on the thread. I don't like 'I get confused with these words' at all. These means that a third party confuses the speaker himself and his words. How odd!
Honestly, I never learn this active form of the verb “confuse” to mean “to be confused”passively
I am completely baffled about your sentence. Now I got really confused !
If one says “ I confuse Larry’s birthday with John’s”. it would sound like a scratch on a chalk board to my ears because that says you are intiating th