1) Anyone/he/I can ride a bike. (we are talking about any bike in general)
2) Person A: Can you solve this problem?
Person B: Well it looks tough to me, but I can. (the speaker thinks they can solve it)
Person A: Then please solve it.
3) Anyone/he/I can ride that bike/your bike/the new bike in the market. (we are talking about a specific bike)
4) Robbing a bank/banks can/could get anyone into trouble. (we are talking about any bank in general)
5) Robbing a bank/banks can/could get him into trouble. (we are talking about any bank in general)
6) Robbing the bank can/could get him into trouble. (we are talking about a specific bank)
7) Robbing the bank can/could get anyone into trouble. (we are talking about a specific bank)
Q1) Do all the examples above make sense?
Q2) What time frame does a sentence with "can" or "could" refer to? Do all of the above sentences refer to the present or to the future or are they just timeless statements?
Note: "could" is used here in the hypothetical/tentative/indirect sense, not the past of "can".
OK. This is my own understanding: By "timeless" statements, I mean a statement that started to be true at some point in the past or that has started to be true just now, and continues to be true in the future until the assumptions implicit in the statement are broken. For example: 1) I/he can ride a bike .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
OK. This is my own understanding:
By "timeless" statements, I mean a statement that started to be true at some point in the past or that has started to be true just now, and continues to be true in the future until the assumptions implicit in the statement are broken. For example:
1) I/he can ride a bike. (= I/he knows how to ride/I/he has the skill)
which, to