0
Catttt Posted 11 years ago
Vocabulary

I can only point them to...

Does the highlighted part mean "as new studies show that learning some hand skills are very difficult for little kids, whenever I encounter someone who suffers from dyslexic or dyspraxic disorders I rapidly remember those hard classes of sewing and stitching"?

Context:

Years of my life were taken up trying to perfect sample stitching (hem stitch, stem stitch, French knots and Lazy Daisy), embroidering a hot-water bottle cover and knitting a pair of ever-expanding socks. I also became acquainted with the arcane skills of drawn-thread work, appliqué, crochet and tatting. My efforts were neither pretty nor useful and the cries of ‘Unpick! Unpick!’ still ring in my ears. Neatness and precision were all-important but I acquired skill enough and might yet show Tracey Emin a thing or two. If subsequent child development studies have shown that it is difficult for children to acquire fine motor skills until a certain age, diagnosing those who struggle thereafter as dyslexic or dyspraxic, I can only point them to samplers cross-stitched by average six- and seven-year-olds in the past. That some of the fabric was pin-pricked with blood was thought of as suitably corrective. We were under strict instruction and the only ‘creative’ say we had in the matter, provided we were good, was a chance to choose our colours from a limited selection of embroidery silks or wool scraps.
  

Top answer

In the highlighted part, the writer seems to be casting doubt on the conclusions of the child development studies. The writer seems to be saying that these are contradicted by the achievements of young children in embroidery.

  • In the highlighted part, the writer seems to be casting doubt on the conclusions of the child development studies.
  • The writer seems to be saying that these are contradicted by the achievements of young children in embroidery.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
In the highlighted part, the writer seems to be casting doubt on the conclusions of the child development studies. The writer seems to be saying that these are contradicted by the achievements of young children in embroidery.
0
Oh, so, with your explanation it should mean "child development studies, diagnosing those who suffer from dyslexic or dyspraxic, assume that it is difficult for children to learn difficult jobs at very young ages, but in response to them I draw their attention to the hard sewing works that were stitched by average six- and seven-year-olds in the past"? Yeah?
0
@GPY Does "diagnosing those who struggle thereafter as dyslexic or dyspraxic" go to "child development studies"?
0
red apple@GPY Does "diagnosing those who struggle thereafter as dyslexic or dyspraxic" go to "child development studies"?
I am not certain exactly what you mean by "go to"; however, "subsequent child development studies" is logically the subject of "diagnosing".

Related Questions