0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage

"I almost forgot."

Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure out if you can "almost forget" in the past tense, because logically you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).

Matthew Shepherd
  

Top answer

[nq:1]Is that actually good English? [/nq] Well, people also say "I nearly didn't remember" if you feel more comfortable with that. Perhaps "I almost forgot" is a sort of prolepsis, being equivalent to "I was nearly in the position of having forgotten at the time when it would have been too late".

  • [nq:1]Is that actually good English?
  • [/nq] Well, people also say "I nearly didn't remember" if you feel more comfortable with that.
  • Perhaps "I almost forgot" is a sort of prolepsis, being equivalent to "I was nearly in the position of having forgotten at the time when it would have been too late".
  • Mike.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
[nq:1]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure out ifyou can "almost forget" in the past tense, because logically you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
Well, people also say "I nearly didn't remember" if you feel more comfortable with that. Perhaps "I almost forgot" is a sort of prolepsis, being equivalent to "I was nearly in the position of having
0
[nq:1]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure out if you can "almost forget" in the past tense, because logically you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
It's perfectly natural English, used when you remember something just in time. I suppose it's actually an abbreviation of "I almost forgot to *** before YYY", e.g. "I almost forgot to tell you befo
0
Matt Shepherd wrote on 19 Nov 2004:
[nq:1]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure out if you can "almost forget" in the past tense, because logically you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
Anything that's idiomatic is automatically good English even if it can be attacked for incorrect grammar or illogical semantics. Good English is what we say
0
[nq:1]Matt Shepherd wrote on 19 Nov 2004:[/nq]
[nq:2]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure ... you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
[nq:1]Anything that's idiomatic is automatically good English even if it can be attacked for incorrect grammar or illogical semantics. Good English is what we say it is, not what some rule books claim it ought
0
[nq:2]Matt Shepherd wrote on 19 Nov 2004: Anything that's idiomatic ... not what some rule books claim it ought to be.[/nq]
[nq:1]Idiomatic almost equals idiotic if it's picked at. Most idioms can't be translated word for word to another language because ... Ouch. I don't recall now what it was (30 years will do that) but his reaction I do remember. Vividly.[/nq]
Very dangerous, as you fou
0
[nq:1]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure out if you can "almost forget" in the past tense, because logically you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
It's idiomatic for "I forgot for a moment, but now I've remembered again."

Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
0
[nq:2]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure ... you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
[nq:1]It's idiomatic for "I forgot for a moment, but now I've remembered again."[/nq]
And the "almost" says something about the relative timing, doesn't it? "I've remembered just now, just in time. I came close to continuing to forget, through this crucial
0
[nq:1]Matt Shepherd wrote on 19 Nov 2004:[/nq]
[nq:2]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure ... you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
[nq:1]Anything that's idiomatic is automatically good English even if it can be attacked for incorrect grammar or illogical semantics. Good English is what we say it is, not what some rule books claim it ought
0
On 18 Nov 2004 23:57:42 GMT, CyberCypher
[nq:1]Matt Shepherd wrote on 19 Nov 2004:[/nq]
[nq:2]Is that actually good English? I've been trying to figure ... you had forgotten until you ceased to forget (or remembered).[/nq]
[nq:1]Anything that's idiomatic is automatically good English even if it can be attacked for incorrect grammar or illogical semantics.[/nq]
Acceptable English, b
0
Charles Riggs wrote on 21 Nov 2004:

I'm just imitating the grammer genius.

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.

Related Questions