Hello...
Below is from Quirk et al.
It may lead some, for example, to replace their usual was by subjunctive were in if I was strong enough, I would help you, or to replace who by whom in the teacher who I most admired.
**********
It says that the the were in "if I were strong enough, I would help you" is hypercorrection.
But I find many occasions of "If I were a bird, I would fly to you".
Is the were in "If I were strong enough, I would help you" hypercorrection and should it be
"If I was strong enough, I would help you"?
pructus Is the were in "If I were strong enough, I would help you" hypercorrection and should it be"If I was strong enough, I would help you"? Well, Quirk certainly thinks so. Frankly, I don't see his point, but whatever it is, it seems to be a very fine point.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
pructusIs the were in "If I were strong enough, I would help you" hypercorrection and should it be"If I was strong enough, I would help you"?
Well, Quirk certainly thinks so.
Frankly, I don't see his point, but whatever it is, it seems to be a very fine point. When I speak and write, I do not parse the grammar quite so closely as that, so I'd use 'we
If I were strong enough, I would help you.
I tend to agree with Quirk.
This mood form of "were" is a relic of an earlier system, and many speakers use the somewhat less formal, and perfectly acceptable, "was".
I suspect that "were" is more widely used by older speakers, though I've no reliable evidence of this to hand.
The meaning and grammar are the same wi