How you native americans think about this?

In the first group, you are the direct cause of the change.

In the second group, you are the indirect cause of the change.
(You cause the action which causes the change.)

There are subtle differences among your examples.
And some of them are unnatural.

-get somebody angry ~ succeed in making s.o. become angry (usually on purpose, but also, possibly, accidentally)
-get the jar open ~ succeed in opening the jar
-get the house painted ~ have the house painted ~ arrange for s.o. to paint the house (or accomplish the task yourself)
-get someone to the bank ~ take s.o. to the bank (in your car, usually)

None of them, strictly spea

So native americans think of "get" in these cases as succed,succed,have and take literally?
Dont u have some kind of interpretation in this cases of the "get" like obtain(non strictly speaking)?
How do u percept the "get" in these cases?

AnonymousSo native americans think of "get" in these cases as succed,succed,have and take literally?

I believe that's what I said. Yes.

AnonymousDont u have some kind of interpretation in this cases of the "get" like obtain(non strictly speaking)?

Not unless you take the 'obtain' meaning of 'get' to include obtaining result

I most respectfully remind you that here in the United States the term "Native Americans" is a polite way to refer to the native or original inhabitants who lived here before the Europeans arrived in what we now call the United States.

I most respectfully suggest that you simply say "Americans." Thus, maybe the title of your thread could have been something like:
"How do Americans i

Strange. I am a native American, James, but I have no Native American blood. I think your suggestion is overly prescriptive.