0
Jacky Shen Posted 14 years ago
Speech & Pronunciation

how to pronounce the word fermented

how to pronounce the word fermented ,it should be pronounce f?r'mentid or f?r'mendid ?
  

Top answer

BTW, I refer to the America accent

  • BTW, I refer to the America accent
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
BTW, I refer to the America accent
0
quynh: I think It should be pronounce fer'memtid
0
American Broadcast English makes that f?r'mentid.

My accent makes it f?r'menid. I can hardly believe it myself.
0
I found the word in the following URL ,the phonetic is fermentid ,but the record sounds like fermendid ,So I puzzled
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=154914381
0
I hear 't' in that NPR podcast (like around 00:11).

VntV > VnV, when the first V is stressed (cf. twenty)
VntV > VndV, when the first V is not stressed. (cf. seventy)

In both cases, the second V is not stressed.

In that sense, both /f?'ment?d, -'menid/ are realized. Nothing dialectal. It is more of a register issue.
0
Hi raindoctor,
thank you ,
1 "VntV > VnV, when the first V is stressed (cf. twenty)" but there is no V in the word twenty.
2,what is the meaning for VntV > VnV or VntV > VndV?
0
< y > is a grapheme (orthography); in speech, it is realized as a vowel. The reference vowel set in this case is HAPPY lexical set.

X > Y: speech segment X can become speech segment Y. Well, that's how to write a phonological process in a crude way. When you represent a phonological process, you need to represent the context and changes. That's what I did. nt can become nd, whe
0
raindoctor
sorry for my late reply,thank you so much.
0
raindoctorVntV > VndV, when the first V is not stressed. (cf. seventy)
This works for "seventy", but not for "warranty" or "warranted" (the way I say them and heard them said).

I'm wondering why. Is it to do with the morphology? (seven - ty vs warrant -y) Or to do with the relative stress, the second syllable of warranty not being as unstressed a
0
CalifJimI'm wondering why. Is it to do with the morphology? (seven - ty vs warrant -y
CJ,

you are right on that. Yes, it has to do with syllabic boundary. The /t/ deletion does not occur if a syllabic boundary divides //n// and //t//. cf. seven-ty, coven-try, Washing~ton /w???nd?n/, in#to, etc--one hears /d/ here. warran(t)~y: /t/ gets deleted.

Related Questions