I was looking at David Appleyard's Guide to Article Usage in English and saw these two parts and am wondering how applicable these recommendations ?? are.
No article is needed for most places consisting of just the name of a person, or the name of a person/place followed by a noun. (Some examples given in the Guide are McDonalds and Kennedy Airport.)
The is also used in proper names consisting of noun(s) and/or adjective(s). (Some examples given are The Empire State Building and the English Channel.)
Where do you fit these hypothetical names in, the former one or the latter one, taking them as proper names?
1. Believer Hotel (I thought most proper hotel names need to have a determiner in the front of their names.)
2. Seoul Express Bus Terminal -- which one is applicable here?
3. Festival Station -- Which one is applicable here?
Top answer
Hi, Without looking at the suggested guidelines, here's what I'd instinctively say. 1. Believer Hotel The Believer Hotel.
— Clive
Hi, Without looking at the suggested guidelines, here's what I'd instinctively say.
1.
Believer Hotel The Believer Hotel.
2.
Seoul Express Bus Terminal The Seoul Express Bus Terminal.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
What I have a reservation about is about the situation where a proper name have a person's name as a part of its name. Would you still put the definite article the in front of the proper name?
eg,
John Doe Hotel -- still "The John Doe Hotel"??
John Doe Bus Terminal -- Still "The John Doe Bus Terminal"??
However, this kind of thing can be pretty idiomatic, so I'd hesitate about any definite rule.
One factor, for instance, is sometimes whether the place you are talking about is in the place where you live. eg My city only has one airport. I might call it 'Fred Smith airport'. But someone who lives out of town, and who