0
Mitsuo23 Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

How do you judge what kind of would.

Hi,

This maybe a stupid-sounded question, but is there a possibility that you, native speakers of English, take "would" mistakenly?

What I mean here is, "would" has many usages and sometimes I can't judge that a particular "would" is being used for "used to" or simply "past tense of will".

Here are examples: It's from Me Talk Pretty One Day

Around the first of the month, when the bills came due for the phone, gas, and electricity, Valencia (1)would have me go through the books and make a list of everyone who owed her money. (2)She'd notice, for example, that a bookstore in London had an overdue account of seventeen dollars. "Seventeen dollars! I want you to call them now and tell them to send it to me."

(3)I'd point out that the long-distance call (4)would cost more than the money she was owed, but she didn't seem to care, saying that it was the principle that bothered her. "Call them now before they have their tea."


(5) I'd then pick up the phone and pretend to dial. There was no way I could get heavy-handed and demand that an English person send me money, even if he owed it to me personally. Holding the receiver up to my mouth, (6)I'd look out across the garden and into the orderly homes of Valencia's neighbors.




1) seems like a repeated action so this should mean "used to."



2) seems like a one-time action because it says "for example" and gives the reader a very specific example, but at the same time it's one of her customs and this kind of scene obviously happens repeatedly. So, I don't know how I should take this one.



3) same as No.2



4) past tense of will



5) same as No.2



6) same as No.2



Thank you for your help,

M
  

Top answer

In this passage, it's confusing because he's using something that happened once (a London bookstore having an overdue account) to represent something that happened repeatedly in the past (Valencia wanting people to pay the money they owed her). The answer is that it's kind of both "used to" and "past tense of will" at the same time. Here's another example of the same effect: A: I loved going to that restaurant as a kid.

  • In this passage, it's confusing because he's using something that happened once (a London bookstore having an overdue account) to represent something that happened repeatedly in the past (Valencia wanting people to pay the money they owed her).
  • The answer is that it's kind of both "used to" and "past tense of will" at the same time.
  • Here's another example of the same effect: A: I loved going to that restaurant as a kid.
  • B: Really?
  • Why?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
In this passage, it's confusing because he's using something that happened once (a London bookstore having an overdue account) to represent something that happened repeatedly in the past (Valencia wanting people to pay the money they owed her). The answer is that it's kind of both "used to" and "past tense of will" at the same time.

Here's another example of the same effect:

A: I
0
mitsuwao23is there a possibility that you, native speakers of English, take "would" mistakenly?
I would not put it that way! We certainly don't analyze it in the great depth that learners of English do. We don't have several different kinds of would floating around in our brains. We can only tell you what kind of would it is after we think ab
0
Thank you, people, for taking your time to solve my question.

I've been thinking this "would" issue more than 5 years, and I think I finally understood it. Well, I'd say, I finally reached the point, I don't have to analyze it, meaing I can feel "would."[

Related Questions