What I wanted to express through the following sentence is that students who need to be archaeologists couldn't achieve what they need if there wasn't history subjects in university curriculums. I just wanted to express the idea through a question with the invasion of the second conditionals. Please someone let me know whether the following sentence is correct in terms of grammar.
Mainly focusing on such cutting-edge subjects, nonetheless, does not mean that art subjects should be removed completely from the university curriculums. Were they, for example, to ignore history courses, how someone interested in archaeology and need to be an archaeologist would achieve their target?
dileepa What I wanted to express through in the following sentence is that students who need to be archaeologists couldn't can't achieve what they need if there wasn't aren't history subject s in university curriculums. I just wanted to express the idea through a question with the invasion introduction of the second conditionals. Please someone Can someone please let me know whether the following sentence is correct in terms of grammar ?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
dileepaWhat I wanted to express
throughin the following sentence is that students who need to be archaeologistscouldn'tcan't achieve what they need if therewasn'taren't history subjects in universi