0
Guzhao67 Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Historic present

Hi: could you explain why we in general don't say things like "Hitler loses the Second World War"? even if we consider this event as having lasting and actual significance. however, we usually say things like "COLUMBUS discovers America in 1492". Is there any tacit rules accounting for that? Thank you
  

Top answer

Hi, could you explain why we in general don't say things like "Hitler loses the Second World War"? even if we consider this event as having lasting and actual significance. however, we usually say things like "COLUMBUS discovers America in 1492".

  • Hi, could you explain why we in general don't say things like "Hitler loses the Second World War"?
  • even if we consider this event as having lasting and actual significance.
  • however, we usually say things like "COLUMBUS discovers America in 1492".
  • <<< I don't think I've ever actually heard anyone say that.
  • Is there any tacit rules accounting for that?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Hi,
could you explain why we in general don't say things like "Hitler loses the Second World War"? even if we consider this event as having lasting and actual significance. however, we usually say things like "COLUMBUS discovers America in 1492". <<< I don't think I've ever actually heard anyone say that.

Is there any tacit rules accounting for that?
Generally speaking,
0
I agree with Clive.

One place in which it is not unusual to see the historic present used is on a timeline which indicates a series of dates and the events that took place on those dates. A timeline about the past lists a (chronological) series of factual events -- NOT just one single event. Each event is usually stated in an extremely basic fashion, and with a specific d
0
EXCELLENT! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
0
THANK YOU VERY VERY VERY MUCH! YOUR EXPLANATION IS REALLY HELPFUL!

Related Questions