Hey guys.
I have recently posted a question in this forum which was about an explicit subject in a non-finite gerund clause:
Becoming rich is what I want
Seeing is awesome
My becoming rich is what I want
His seeing is awesome
Sometimes, we can say "Me becoming rich is.." or "Him seeing is.." this is the informal way to add the subject to a gerund phrase. However, for a while, I wondered why not say just "Me becoming.." which would be the most logical? - So, I reached a conclusion: It could be possibly confused wih another grammatical structure:
For instance: If I said: I witnessed his achieving his dreams.
"His achieving his dreams" is a gerund phrase with an explicit subject, which is acting as the direct object/verb complement of the verb: "Witnessed", however, if I changed it for: I witnessed him achieving the summit.
Its grammatical structure could be misunderstood, like: I witnessed him achieving his dreams, - "him" would be the direct object/verb complement of the verb "Witnessed" and "achieving his dreams" would be a gerund phrase acting as the object complement, correct?
What do you think?
" As the subject of the verb, is, those are ungrammatical. Prodigy Its grammatical structure could be misunderstood, like: I witnessed him achieving his dreams, - "him" would be the direct object/verb complement of the verb "Witnessed" and "achieving his dreams" would be a gerund phrase acting as the object complement, correct? No.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Prodigy"Me becoming rich is.." or "Him seeing is.."
As the subject of the verb, is, those are ungrammatical.
ProdigyIts grammatical structure could be misunderstood, like: I witnessed him achieving his dreams, - "him" would be the direct object/verb complement of the verb "Witnessed" and "achieving his dreams" would be a