0
Bepleased Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

His nationality isn't relevant to whether he's a good lawyer

Hello, Could any native speaker give your suggestions for the following rephrased sentences?

Thank you for your help.

A. the original sentence: {His nationality isn't relevant to whether he's a good lawyer.}

( 1 ) rephrased: There is not his nationality in whether he's a good lawyer.

( 2 ) rephrased: His nationality is not subjected to whether he's a good lawyer

B. the original sentence: {facts relative to this question}

( 1 ) rephrased: There are facts in this question.

( 2 ) rephrased: Facts are subjected to this question.

( 3 ) reohraed: Facts derive from this question.

e.g. Several facts of unfairness exist in this question of the current situation of economics.

  

Top answer

} bepleased ( 1 ) rephrased: There is not his nationality in whether he's a good lawyer. Wrong Grammar ( 2 ) rephrased: His nationality is not subjected to whether he's a good lawyer. Wrong semantics bepleased the original sentence: {facts relative to this question} This is not a sentence.

  • } bepleased ( 1 ) rephrased: There is not his nationality in whether he's a good lawyer.
  • Wrong Grammar ( 2 ) rephrased: His nationality is not subjected to whether he's a good lawyer.
  • Wrong semantics bepleased the original sentence: {facts relative to this question} This is not a sentence.
  • bepleased ( 1 ) rephrased: There are facts in this question.
  • Questions are not facts, therefore this is illogical.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
bepleased the original sentence: {His nationality isn't relevant to whether he's a good lawyer.}
bepleased( 1 ) rephrased: There is not his nationality in whether he's a good lawyer. Wrong Grammar
0
Hello,

For your question and correction:

(1) What are you trying to achieve by rephrasing? The reason is that I am wanting to confirm that the structure of English
based on "why" / "how" or "agent" / "receiver" (how = agent; why = receiver).

(2) I try to right it in Grammar: His nationality isn't the explanation of / for whether he's a good lawyer.
(his nationa
0
(4) e.g. Several facts of unfairness exist in this question of the current situation of economics.Based on the above sentence, we are certain my rephrased is logical and relevant.
0
bepleased1) What are you trying to achieve by rephrasing? The reason is that I am wanting to confirm that the structure of Englishbased on "why" / "how" or "agent" / "receiver" (how = agent; why = receiver).(2) I try to right it in Grammar: His nationality isn't the explanation of / for whether he's a good lawyer.(his nationality = receiver / why )(3) for semantics: His n

Related Questions