Hi teachers hope you would help me mark it

Some people think that school are no necessary because children can get information available through the Internet and they can just study as well as home. To what extent do you agree and disagree?

Recently, it is believed that nowadays, the Internet can replace school as a place of education for children thanks to the seemingly limitless amount of information it provides. Personally, I completely disagree with this view for several reasons.

First, it is undeniable that schools are likely to create a more suitable study program for pupils. Contrary to the uncontrollably immense information on the Internet, the content of schools, which are selective and compiled carefully by the skillful professors, would available students to seek the perfect learning. Second, when going to schools, students would be under the supervision of teachers. Their discipline, when learning, therefore, would be monitored more tightly than their self-learning. Moreover, the teachers would instruct them when they get wrong, which learning at home could not furnish them clearly.

The most vital reason is that schools would bring the most effective learning environment for learners. Going to school, students would have opportunities to learn with other friends. As a result, they would not only hone learning skills but also sharpen a wide range of their soft skills. For example, when presenting a lecture to their class, they would have chances to develop debating skills, accessing and analyzing information skills, communication skills… Additionally, pupils could participate in some extracellular activities, too, that promote student’s physical and intellectual and emotional development. This, of course, helps them have good health to study in the best state.

For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students should opt to study at school to approach the best place of knowledge-centre education.

(260 words)