0
Astonishing Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

He/she/it + were

Hey,

This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct:

'If he were here'

'If she were a little bigger'

You get the picture. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
  

Top answer

Astonishing Hey, This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct: 'If he were here' [If he were (not 'am') a king, he would rule wisely. But it is not possible for him to be a king.

  • Astonishing Hey, This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me.
  • Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct: 'If he were here' [If he were (not 'am') a king, he would rule wisely.
  • But it is not possible for him to be a king.
  • Therefore 'were' is used.
  • ) 'If she were a little bigger' (Explanation is the same as above.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
Astonishing
Hey,

This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct:

'If he were here' [If he were (not 'am') a king, he would rule wisely. But it is not possible for him to
0
As a footnote:

1. If he were here now, he would be able to answer the question.

2. If she were a little bigger, she wouldn't be quite so small.

The "were" in these examples is called the "past subjunctive". The past subjunctive is used principally in conditional (hypothetical) statements, such as #1 and #2.

Whereas the "normal" past singular is "w
0
AstonishingHey,
This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct:
'If he were here'
'If she were a little bigger'
You get the picture. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
0
the answer is if she was
0
The use of the word "were" in these scenarios is correct because the "if' makes them conditional. Thus, these scenarios may or may not happen because of the "if" which is the condition that makes the examples conditional. Hopefull this helps.
0
"If he were" etc. is a subjunctive phrase. It describes a situation that is not the case, in other words, contrary to fact.
0
For example: we use if she were here, when we refer to a suposition (we dont know if she was here)

While: we she was here for a real true or statement

Reference:

Related Questions