Astonishing Hey, This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct: 'If he were here' [If he were (not 'am') a king, he would rule wisely. But it is not possible for him to be a king.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Astonishing
Hey,
This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct:
'If he were here' [If he were (not 'am') a king, he would rule wisely. But it is not possible for him to
AstonishingHey,
This has been bothering me for a while; as it makes no sense what so ever to me. Does anyone mind explaining why the following sentences (and he/she/it + were in general) are considered gramatically correct:
'If he were here'
'If she were a little bigger'
You get the picture. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.