0Dear teachers ,02br 02br 00Can I say " he is a 01b00hereditary 02b00revolutionary activist" to express the idea that he is a revolutionary activist who comes from a family with the tradition of taking part in revolutionary movements ( i.e His father is a leader of a revolutionary movement , his sisters are all members of a local revolutionary movement struggling for equality between men and women , and his mother ,too) 02br 02br 00Thank you in advance0-
Top answer
0He comes from a long line of revolutionaries. 0-
— BarbaraPA
0He comes from a long line of revolutionaries.
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0He comes from a long line of revolutionaries. (That implies that his father and grandfather as well, etc.)02br 02br 00It seems that being a revolutionary is a family affair.02br 02br 00Revolutionaries run in the family.0-
0 Diabetes, which is linked to improper diets, is also a 01b00hereditary disease. 02br 00Hereditary - characteristics passed on from generation to genreation, of genetic inference. 02b00 0-
0I'd suggest the answer to your question is, "no." "Family traditions" are by definition not inherited. They're taught. (Nurture, not nature.) Perhaps a hundred years ago people might have used your expression, because we had not yet learned otherwise. 02br 02br 00(You might inherit certain rebellious traits, not to mention the family fortune.)0-
0Thank you Avangi , Grammar Geek , and Goodman.02br 02br 00I see in the Vietnamese-English dictionary the phrase " a 01b00hereditary artist02b00 " . I wonder whether "hereditary" is used the right way here. Please help me with this issue . To me , " hereditary " is wrongly used here , but because it is in a dictionary so I am not sure whether I am
0Hi guys,02br 02br 01font00" he is a 01b00hereditary 02b00revolutionary activist"02font02br 02br 00I think of things rather than people as being hereditary, so I'd prefer to say 01b00"His involvement in revolutionary activism is hereditary".02b02br 02br 00Bes
0Hi Tuongvan, 02br 02br 00Now you've tweaked my curiosity. How did "art" sneak into the conversation? The notion has been around for a long time that art was in the genes (music, acting, painting, etc.), but I rather think that the more science we learn, the more we tend to file this "notion" away with other folk lore. Perhaps CJ can shed some light.02br 02br
0 Just about the only thing we inherit is the ability to make certain proteins. But there are thousands and thousands of them, so it is still impossible at this stage of the science to determine what some of these proteins do and how they interact to influence behavior. There is certainly no such thing as a revolutionary gene (or its corresponding protein), or a music gene (or its protein
0Hi Califjim and Avangi,02br 02br 00You are both quite right about it . Maybe that is a wrong translation in the dictionary , but frankly speaking , I am very confused about the use of the word " hereditary " . For example , in Oxford dictionary they also use hereditary for people .02br 02br 00Quote :02br 02br 00" 02br 01
0Of course the legal meaning or usage of "hereditary" is entirely separate from the biological one. This applies to certain titles and ranks, and rights to property etc., as your dictionary definitions 2 & 3 suggest.02br 02br 00Definition #1 is what CJ and I were talking about. Things like eye color, suceptibility to certain diseases (hemophilia, type 1 diabetes, epilepsy)