0
Mathias25 Posted 11 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing
Help on an essay writting
Topic: Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations?
One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their job. Wealthy nations are well known by their economic and social power in comparison with poorer nations, that have a weaker one. Wealthy nations should help poorer ones in order to keep the world with economic health and also save lifes.
First of all, almost every person knows the poverty that exists in poorest nations like many countries in Africa and the other side of the coin that are the richest ones such as England or the USA. If there exists an incredible different economic state between these countries, then why there haven't been an act to change this?. The answer could be because if they do it, the richest countries would get a worse economy, but this is not true because once they do it, they would enrich the poorest countries and this causes that in times of economic crisis for the richest countries, the supported countries would help them and this produces an even more stable economy.
Secondly, with helping poorer nations they don't only ensure a more stable economy because they also save lifes that are living in poor conditions in those countries, generating that this also be an ethical and religious action. For example, in Africa hundreds of thousands of persons die of hunger in the year because of the extreme poverty that doesn't let them have the necessary food. This fact could change easily if the countries would be more generous.
Therefore, to keep an economic health all around the world and at the same time save important lifes, wealthy nations should help poorer ones.
One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their job. Wealthy nations are well known by their economic and social power in comparison with poorer nations, that have a weaker one. Wealthy nations should help poorer ones in order to keep the world with economic health and also save lifes.
First of all, almost every person knows the poverty that exists in poorest nations like many countries in Africa and the other side of the coin that are the richest ones such as England or the USA. If there exists an incredible different economic state between these countries, then why there haven't been an act to change this?. The answer could be because if they do it, the richest countries would get a worse economy, but this is not true because once they do it, they would enrich the poorest countries and this causes that in times of economic crisis for the richest countries, the supported countries would help them and this produces an even more stable economy.
Secondly, with helping poorer nations they don't only ensure a more stable economy because they also save lifes that are living in poor conditions in those countries, generating that this also be an ethical and religious action. For example, in Africa hundreds of thousands of persons die of hunger in the year because of the extreme poverty that doesn't let them have the necessary food. This fact could change easily if the countries would be more generous.
Therefore, to keep an economic health all around the world and at the same time save important lifes, wealthy nations should help poorer ones.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations?
Top answer
I only have time to offer you one quick comment Your first sentence is One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their job. This seems to suggest by analogy that wealthier nations should not help poorer ones. chose to start with this sentence?
- I only have time to offer you one quick comment Your first sentence is One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their job.
- This seems to suggest by analogy that wealthier nations should not help poorer ones.
- chose to start with this sentence?
- Clive
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
3 Answers
0
I only have time to offer you one quick comment
Your first sentence is
One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their
Your first sentence is
One common opinion expressed by mothers is that their sons have to stand up by themselves, without the help of anybody to learn, otherwise they wouldn't learn to stand up because other individual would do their
00
To show the opposing view of my thesis statement and to give a little introduction about my topic. Also the first sentence in essays has the function to engage the reader with an interesting sentence
00
Then you need to state clearly that you disagree, eg by continuing with ''However, . . . '
Clive
Clive
0
Related Questions