Help needed in review

Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

There are numerous ways of living a better and satisfied life. Some people argue that generating large income and having less free time is more favorable than earning less income with much free time while others are opposed to this view. Job with the enormous compensation regardless of a spare time, in my opinion, is the better option because of happiness.

The proponents of low-paid jobs with much free time believe that money is not the sole reason of happiness, and they should have time for other things as well. That is to say that instead of running after money, they can decrease their expenses and fulfil their needs with the available income. In addition, they ought to spend their spare time with families and friends who expect them to be available at home after work. In Beijing, for instance, most factory workers do not opt for overtime even though the rates of overtime are much higher than the normal wages. This is because these people want to give time to their parents and children.

On the contrary, advocates of high-salaried jobs with less spare time believe that money can bring happiness in life. This is because affordability of these people increases manifold as they can afford to buy anything they want in their life. In other words, one cannot only meet their usual expenses but also opt to live lavishly since their large income allow them to do so. The doctors in Karachi, for example, have lesser time for their families but more money than other professionals. They are the most happiest because they can afford to live in expensive houses and support lavish lifestyle.

In conclusion, those occupations which offer large salaries but less free time are more advantageous because more money enable people to afford everything which brings happiness in their lives.