"There are very few things on this planet, which if safe, I would not try."
What does this sentence mean? Does it mean that the person would try something if it's safe or unsafe? I think it's the latter, but the original writer insists that the sentence means the former. Why does it mean that the person would try almost anything, but only things that are safe?
The sentence says, "which if safe, I would not try". If safe, I would not try -- Doesn't this mean that she wouldn't try anything which is safe?
Thanks.
Top answer
Welcome to English Forums, user2010. He would try almost anything that is safe. Unsafe things he would not try.
— Mister Micawber
Welcome to English Forums, user2010.
He would try almost anything that is safe.
Unsafe things he would not try.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I don't understand. Can you guys explain why it means that the person would try anything which is safe? The sentence says "there are very few things on this planet, which IF say, I would NOT try." -- Doesn't this clearly mean that IF safe, she would NOT try? Thanks.
One thing, though... Is it an assumption to say that there are very many things I would try if they were safe? How does the original sentence imply the very many other things? The very many other things could be dangerous.
Yeah, now I understand the original sentence, but I don't see how the it means that there are many other safe things that I would try. Just because I wouldn't try a few things which are safe doesn't mean that I would try the remaining things (which amount to "many other things") because they because they are safe. It could mean that the many other things are not safe, I would try them for other un