0
Thanh kieu thi Posted 9 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing

Help me task 2 ielts:Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion.

It is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds attract too much concerns and utilize many resources of society. Personally, I completely agreed with this idea.


On the one hand, there are several reasons why many people have paid too much attention to protect wild animals and birds. Firstly, many non-government organizations are built and expanded which express deep concern for almost animal species in a way quite unnecessarily. For instance, an animal protection organization accused Katy Perry of using the image of tigers in her own music video “ road” for commercial purposes while she did not. Secondary, nowadays the information about protecting animal receives more concerns in social network. Therefore, when a bear is hunted or suffered, immediately the news spread quickly throughout Facebook or others even though they are not aware of reasons.


On the other hand, people also have spent too many resources preserving wild birds. Any projects which are set up to save and take care for wild birds require a large amount of money. For instance, to find out a suitable DNA to protect wild birds seem quite hard, and obviously, the more difficult they meet, the more money they pay. Besides, a huge investments in wild animals and birds is quite unnecessary in some cases. Instead of spending money on such plans, people should invest in projects such as school, hospital or charity organization.


In conclusion, I would certainly agreed that many resources and attention are focused on the projection of wild animals and birds.

  

Top answer

thanh kieu thi It is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds Wild animals include birds therefore, your wording does not make sense. It would be more logical to omit the words "and birds".

  • thanh kieu thi It is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds Wild animals include birds therefore, your wording does not make sense.
  • It would be more logical to omit the words "and birds".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
thanh kieu thiIt is argued that the protection of wild animals and birds

Wild animals include birds therefore, your wording does not make sense. It would be more logical to omit the words "and birds".

Related Questions