0
T509 Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Help me!

0Help me with the sentece below.02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
01font00Neither the market nor the backlash alone presents much hope for the poor 01u00the world over02u00 who farm cotton or stitch T-shirts together, but in the unintentional conspiracy between the two sides there is promise.02font02br
02br
02br
02br
00I don't understand what the words underlined is doing in the sentence.02br
02br
00Or which words or phrases they are related to.02br
02br
00It seems to me that the sentence does have a meaning without them.02br
02br
00Any suggestion?02br
02br
0-
  

Top answer

02font 02br 02br 01font 00I don't understand what the words underlined is doing in the sentence. 01b 00'The world over' is a literary way of saying 'all over the world'. 02font 02br 02br 01font 00It seems to me that the sentence does have a meaning without them.

  • 02font 02br 02br 01font 00I don't understand what the words underlined is doing in the sentence.
  • 01b 00'The world over' is a literary way of saying 'all over the world'.
  • 02font 02br 02br 01font 00It seems to me that the sentence does have a meaning without them.
  • 01b 00Yes, it does, but without the phrase we don't know where these poor people are.
  • Are they the ones who live in the USA?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
1font01b00Hi,02b02font02br
02br
01font00Neither the market nor the backlash alone presents much hope for the poor 01u00the world over02u00 who farm cotton or stitch T-shirts together, but in the unintentional conspiracy between the two sides there is promise.02font
0
0Thank you, Clive.02br
02br
00Now I understand quite well what the words mean.02br
02br
00But isn't it more natural to say 'the poor (all) over the world' than the original?0-
0
0Hi,02br
02br
00Yes. But the original phrase is more literary, more poetic even.02br
02br
00Clive0-

Related Questions