My guess is that the distancing quality of "would" is supposed to indicate that you personally might not wear or eat this, but people generally could. While "you" is often used colloquially to mean "people in general", it might nevertheless be unclear whether a boy should answer "bra" to "Name three things that you wear under your clothes", for example. If this is the reason, I'm not sure that "would" is the best solution though.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousWhat does would mean here?Oof! Who knows? One possible paraphrase invokes the idea of willingness.
AnonymousWhy can't we just use simple present
fivejedjonWe receive many questions about similar questions with 'would', Some of us sometimes suggest that the reason is an implied if- clause, others that the would is a distancing of will in the certainty sense. Other ideas emerge from time to time,Although my main interest in grammar is the workings of the tense system in English, I have never been able to come up wit
CalifJim AnonymousWhat does would mean here?Oof! Who knows? One possible paraphrase invokes the idea of willingness.What are you willing to wear under you clothes?What food are you willing to eat every day?Others have already given other possibilities.AnonymousWhy can't we just use simple present?We're not talking about what people actually do in this real world of ours.
AnonymousThe sentences were used on the Ellen show to a celebrity in a game.I was assuming they were sentences in a test for English learners. This is the sort of context that would be very helpful to include in your questions, especially with words like "would" that can have all sorts of meanings and nuances.
GPY AnonymousThe sentences were used on the Ellen show to a celebrity in a game.I was assuming they were sentences in a test for English learners. This is the sort of context that would be very helpful to include in your questions, especially with words like "would" that can have all sorts of meanings and nuances.Do you think would was used incorrectly in the
Anonymous'name three things you would wear under clothes if you could afford.'I'm confused now. This is a different sentence altogether. Now it has an "if" clause (albeit one that is not completely correct). Why has the sentence changed?
GPY Anonymous'name three things you would wear under clothes if you could afford.'I'm confused now. This is a different sentence altogether. Now it has an "if" clause (albeit one that is not completely correct). Why has the sentence changed?The sentence hasn't changed. I tried to make sense out of the sentence making own if clause.