0
Helixa Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Hello teachers

Hello teachers,

How are you today? I would like to ask you when do we use 'were to' in conditional clauses and can we use it in general instead of 'if' even when the conditional form is likely. Can you give me example. Can I say: Regarding the Bourgas-Alexandroupolis pipeline, potential benefits could increase if Bulgarian tankers were to transport the oil. (Having in mind that it can happen likely in general?)
And one more thing: Ukraine or the Ukraine?

Best regards: Eli
  

Top answer

You may say: Potential benefits could increase if Bulgarian tankers (were to transport)/ (transported) the oil; in the United States, most people now refer to Ukraine, without the article.

  • You may say: Potential benefits could increase if Bulgarian tankers (were to transport)/ (transported) the oil; in the United States, most people now refer to Ukraine, without the article.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
You may say: Potential benefits could increase if Bulgarian tankers (were to transport)/ (transported) the oil; in the United States, most people now refer to Ukraine, without the article.

Related Questions