0
Eng.noob Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

He would have COME / He would have TOLD

Hi,

I have a doubt. Why is present tense(COME) used in 1st sentence and why past(TOLD) in 2nd sentence?
I mean its never writen "he would have came", yet its true that "he would have TOLD(not tell)"??

-Thanks.
  

Top answer

noob Hi, I have a doubt. Why is present tense(COME) used in 1st sentence and why past(TOLD) in 2nd sentence? I mean its never writen "he would have came", yet its true that "he would have TOLD(not tell)"??

  • noob Hi, I have a doubt.
  • Why is present tense(COME) used in 1st sentence and why past(TOLD) in 2nd sentence?
  • I mean its never writen "he would have came", yet its true that "he would have TOLD(not tell)"??
  • We say He would have come because 'come' is a past participle, not a simple past tense verb.
  • The verb after 'have' should be be a past participle.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Eng.noobHi,

I have a doubt. Why is present tense(COME) used in 1st sentence and why past(TOLD) in 2nd sentence?
I mean its never writen "he would have came", yet its true that "he would have TOLD(not tell)"??
We say He would have come because 'come' is a past participle, not a simple past tense verb. The verb after 'have' shoul
0
Eng.noobHi,

I have a doubt. Why is present tense(COME) used in 1st sentence and why past(TOLD) in 2nd sentence?
I mean its never writen "he would have came", yet its true that "he would have TOLD(not tell)"??

-Thanks.
Two of the past forms in English are the simple past (sometimes irregular, of course) and t
0
Hi,
look up a verb in the dictionary. You get base form // past // past participle

go ---> go / went / gone
eat --> eat / ate / eaten
walk -> walk / walked / walked
(this is a regular verb, you just have to add -ed at the end)

You use the past for the simple

Related Questions