He would come on stage now...

It would be helpful to see at least the whole of that sentence. However unless there is a surprise like "... if he hadn't lost his voice" or something, I can see no obvious reason for the use of "would".

Mr. TomWhy does the speaker use would here?

There are at least two possible reasons.

1. There's something later in the sentence that explains it.
2. The speaker does not know how to speak English.

CJ

This is the original.

And we are lucky to have him among us today. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Frank would come on stage now and highlight our new policies unless there are no bored faces or droopy eyelids.

Tom

Mr. TomMr. Frank would come on stage now and highlight our new policies unless there are no bored faces or droopy eyelids.

That is not spoken by a native speaker of British or North American English.

No, Fivejedjon -- he was an Indian.

Could you tell me how a native speaker of British or North American English would have said the same sentence? By using will instead of would?

Mr. Frank will come on stage now and highlight our new policies unless there are no bored faces or droopy eyelids.

Thanks,

Tom

Mr. Tomunless there are no bored faces or droopy eyelids.

I really don't know what message the speaker is trying to convey here.

I really don't know what message the speaker is trying to convey here.

Neither do I.

But I guess he was being humorous -- he 'warned' the audience if they looked bored or sleepy, Mr Frank would not come on stage and highlight the new policies.

Tom

Mr. TomMr. Frank will come on stage now and highlight our new policies unless there are no bored faces or droopy eyelids.

As well as the problem with "would", the speaker has got the use of "unless" mixed up. These would make logical sense (still may not be ideal for expressing exactly what was intended):

Mr. Frank will come on stage now and